you guys are just using the raw IMU data for position information? even a simple kalman filter or dogified version of it might have helped reduce the problems you had (though the solutions you propose are by far a better way of doing things. (Solving the problem is better than working around it ;->)) by realising that the attitude engine would probably have altered the rotation rate and cutting it down just based on the prediction. even just a simple model with an empirically determined CG and mass could help a bit (just have to set its trust level fairly low) anyway just a suggestion, you guys probably have your hands full actually doing stuff so I'll be quiet now ;->
----- Original Message ----- From: "John Carmack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 12:56 PM Subject: [ERPS] Armadillo Nov 17 > video and gory details. > > http://www.armadilloaerospace.com/n.x/Armadillo/Home/News?news_id=182 > > John Carmack > > _______________________________________________ > ERPS-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list _______________________________________________ ERPS-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
