On Oct 16, 2008, at 11:38 AM, Waldemar Horwat wrote: > Brendan Eich wrote: >> That's not a valid grammar.
It is unambiguous. How do you define "valid"? >> You can't have an AssignmentExpression terminating a >> PrimaryExpression. It leads to trouble such as: > > let a = b + c > > being interpreted as both: > > (let a = b) + c No, it clearly parses as: > let a = (b + c) and we've shipped this for several releases, and it sees use -- it has not been problematic. Parenthesize if you mean (let a = b) + 1. Same goes for expression closures. Bottom up parsers will shift, top down will consume greedily. So what's the real problem? /be _______________________________________________ Es-discuss mailing list Es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
