On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 6:46 AM, Maciej Stachowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 5, 2008, at 7:52 PM, Mark S. Miller wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> ES3.1 is premised on accepting these dynamics, being originally conceived >> as "ES3 + reality". >> >> > I have heard this repeated many times. I'm not sure where this comes from, > but that has never been the sole conception of ES3.1 by the people > advocating it or working on it. > > > I'm not sure what your goal is in establishing disagreement. Note, I said > "originally conceived", meaning I accept that it has now expanded to > encompass a limited set of brand new features as well. > My point was only to straighten out the history. Oft repeated statements, not corrected, tend to become the history of record. I do not mean to imply there is any current disagreement on the nature, goals, or importance of ES3.1. In fact, I am ecstatic that we have no such disagreements. On the history, ES3+Reality was and is certainly one of the important goals of ES3.1. I had also not meant to imply otherwise. I am trying to correct the impression I've heard repeated many times that ES3.1 was originally conceived as "only ES3+Reality". If that isn't what you meant, my apologies for directing this correction at you. -- Cheers, --MarkM
_______________________________________________ Es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
