On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 2:35 PM, Jon Zeppieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... I do want to > point out, however, that one important combination is omitted in > David-Sarah's proposal (modifier names aside). Private instance > variables would likely be represented as non-configurable, > non-enumerable, yet writable properties. I'm guessing that 'x' and > 'y' (which are suggested by, but left out of the examples above) would > fit that description.
OK -- I just revisited the older messages in the thread. 'x' and 'y' are lexically bound (by the constructor function). So, ignore the above... _______________________________________________ Es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
