On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:27 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock
<allen.wirfs-br...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> The intent was for the ES5 JSON grammar to exactly match the JSON RFC
> grammar. If you think it is different, then you may have found a bug so
> let's make sure...
It definitely doesn't match, on purpose. For example, the RFC requires
JSON strings to represent objects (or arrays) at the root, no
primitives allowed.
>
> Examples, please? The intent is that applying JSON.parse to a string
> containing a valid JSON form should produce an equivalent set of objects on
> all conforming ES5 implementation.
JSON.parse("[010]")
should be an error, per spec. Nobody follows the spec though...
--
Robert Sayre
"I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time."
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
