On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Brendan Eich <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Jan 18, 2010, at 8:51 AM, Mark S. Miller wrote: > > Tobie et al. may want to, but I know many *users* of Prototype who do not. >> We're talking about a large number of actual uses, some of which might want >> to migrate into a module, not necessarily be used cross-module. The cost of >> doing so is low if primordials in that module can be mutated. It goes way up >> if they can't. >> >> Huh? I don't understand this. If they wish to be in the same > mutated-primordial-sandbox as Prototype, as you indicate and seems likely, > then it would not help them if Prototype were packaged as a module > > > No, I wrote "migrate into a module" meaning be part of the inside of a > module -- not be packaged as a module. > > I don't get it. What do you have in mind? > /be > > and modules were the unit of primordial-mutation-sandboxing. Why should > they not just load the existing Prototype into their frame the old fashioned > way? > > Or, yes, they could do the Valija thing, in order to multiplex a frame > among multiple sandboxes. But a Valija sandbox is not a module. I think > we're confusing levels. > > /be >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >> >> > > > -- > Cheers, > --MarkM > > > -- Cheers, --MarkM
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
