On 30 Jun 2010, at 23:32, Brendan Eich wrote: > On Jun 30, 2010, at 2:15 PM, Erik Arvidsson wrote: > >> Sorry, Object.create was a mistake. > > A bit harsh, but my point is not about tone -- it is that the mistake in your > view is the default values for missing attributes being false, not true. > Right?
Rather than having missing boolean values default to true which somehow contradicts ES behavior when dealing with undefined boolean values (!undefined == true), I would have preferred if the properties were defined as their opposites, so default to false would make more sense: writable -> readOnly, configurable -> sealed, etc. But I guess it is what it is now. Jürg _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
