On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:15, Dmitry A. Soshnikov < dmitry.soshni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That's look interesting, yeah, I (personally) like it. Also beside => can > be used "traditional" function definition sign of some functional (and not > only functional) languages: -> > > Coffee (while using -> for functions) uses => sugar for binding the `this` > value with defining a function at the same time: > http://jashkenas.github.com/coffee-script/#fat_arrow which I think also a > good sugar for `.bind` method. > + 1 (my two cents here) Another I thing good point here is that CoffeeScript is a working & successful proof of concept and many webdevs are already familiar with it. Acquiring even more of it's syntax may be a good ide!! Regards -- Irakli Gozalishvili Web: http://www.jeditoolkit.com/ Phone: +31 614 205275 Address: 29 Rue Saint-Georges, 75009 Paris, France <http://goo.gl/maps/3CHu>
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
