Or rather, the legibility is well worth the verbosity of using const... On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Peter van der Zee <e...@qfox.nl> wrote:
> I really dislike the hash notation for this purpose. I have no problem with > either const(){} or const function(){}. The verbosity of using const is well > worth the legibility. > > - peter > > > On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Kevin Curtis <kevinc1...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> If const functions and 'standard' functions are available to a >> developer - what on average will a developer likely use. Will a >> security conscious dev lean towards const functions? >> >> If const functions are preferred then maybe the function shorthand >> notation - if it goes ahead - should map to const functions. >> Especially for anon functions - where the function keyword stands out >> as being rather verbose. >> >> Or with hashes: >> ##(x) {...} // const function >> >> --- >> _______________________________________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> es-discuss@mozilla.org >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >> > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss