On Sep 7, 2010, at 10:28 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 9/7/10 1:21 PM, Brendan Eich wrote: >> See, e.g., https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=593963 -- but this >> is not the first instance. Previously: >> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=579119. > > The latter wasn't blind. It was just a site concatenating a bunch of > third-party scripts together, and one of the third-party scripts (correctly) > using strict.... So that one is totally Amazon's flub, imo.
Thanks -- this clarifies things, and makes me worry about more of the same. "Blind concatenation" is a feature as much as a bug in the history of JS. Combined with script inline content moving out to src= URL-named convent, it is how we end up with Unicode BOMs and <!-- pseudo-comments in the middle of files. /be _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
