On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 07:08, Tom Van Cutsem <tomvc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Both of these seem to be compelling advantages of soft fields over names. > However, I wonder if it would be possible to get the best of both worlds. > IIUC, the Names proposal converts: > private x; > this.x = "foo"; > this.x > > into: > let x = new Name; > this[x] = "foo"; > this[x] > Would it be possible to instead rewrite it to: > let x = new ExplicitSoftField(); > x.set(this, "foo"); > x.get(this) > (using the same rules for determining the scope of 'x' as detailed in the > Names proposal) > You would get the 'private' scoping of Names, and the concise syntax, > without the limitations that MarkM raised. Am I missing something?
+1 x could also be a WeakMap in the sample above. This reminds me; I still don't understand why we would want both ExplicitSoftField and WeakMap. If we make the API for WeakMap not so bare bone it can cover both use cases. The thing I like with the Names proposal compared to using WeakMaps is that using WeakMaps feels very backwards. -- erik _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
