Up to now, the strawman page on "syntax for efficient traits" left unspecified the semantics of trait composition, deferring this to the traits.js library implementation. I thought I'd give a shot at specifying the semantics of trait composition independent of any concrete implementation: < http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:traits_semantics>
Feedback is welcome. I'm sure there are parts that remain unclear and require further specification. Cheers, Tom 2010/9/13 Mark S. Miller <erig...@google.com> > Responding to Brendan's challenge at < > https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2010-September/011825.html>, > I've been working up < > http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:syntax_for_efficient_traits>. > Given the revival of that thread today, now seems like an opportune time to > post it. > > Seeing as how classes-as-sugar is getting a much cooler reception on the > list than traits, if there are no objections, I propose to use the timeslot > on the agenda currently reserved from classes-as-sugar to instead discuss > traits and traits vs classes-as-sugar. > > "Syntax for Efficient Traits" at < > http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:syntax_for_efficient_traits> > is > now ready for discussion. > > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
