> I somehow suspect stringifying the iterator next() return value from for-in > machinery will not placate folks who want for-in not to be metaprogrammable.
Nor would it work -- you wouldn't be able to get the values() or properties() iteration behavior, for example. It would be the worst of all possible compromises. > But harmony:proxies is already spec'ed with an enumerate trap. Something does > not add up. You're right that the line between your items (2) and (3) is > arbitrary. Agreed. Dave _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
