On Dec 16, 2010, at 2:19 PM, Mark S. Miller wrote: > Currently is JS, x['foo'] and x.foo are precisely identical in all contexts. > This regularity helps understandability. The terseness difference above is > not an adequate reason to sacrifice it.
Aren't you proposing the same syntax x[i] where i is a soft field map, to make exactly the same sacrifice? http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:names_vs_soft_fields /be _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
