On May 16, 2011, at 7:53 PM, Mike Samuel wrote: > 2011/5/16 Allen Wirfs-Brock <[email protected]>: >> It already ins't the case that eval(x)===JSON.parse(x). >> See http://timelessrepo.com/json-isnt-a-javascript-subset > > I'm aware of that hole. That doesn't mean that we should break the > relationship for code that doesn't error out in either.
Like I said in the the text after the RFC 4627 quote, nothing would change with this. JSON.parse would continue to produce exactly the same ES strings that it currently does. Allen _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
