Don't be upset! I just believe that new HTML syntax would be better off in the HTML living standard. More people read it, more people contribute to correcting its bugs. Getting involved in it can only be beneficial.
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Brendan Eich <bren...@mozilla.com> wrote: > On May 29, 2011, at 6:45 AM, Thaddee Tyl wrote: > >>>>> Consensus on moving some form of versioning into Harmony. The strawman >>>>> is a >>>>> bit light at this time, so no specifics yet. >>>> >>>> A lot of the above looks like HTML. Isn't versioning that depends on >>>> HTML out of scope for the ECMAScript standard? >>> >>> Yes, so? Call the jusdiction police :-P. We were talking about a "systems" >>> problem, which requires looking across layers and considering the big >>> picture. >>> >>> At the meeting, Mark Miller suggested we take the idea of <script-if> to >>> the public-script-coord mailing list. I'll do that next week. >> >> >> It really needs to be discussed by the whatwg however. > > > Oh really? Why exactly is that? Note that I'm a founder of whatwg.org. > > The plan of record that I cited and plan to use regarding this kind of > JS/HTML/DOM cross-cutting concern is to mail to public-script-co...@w3.org. > That ought to be enough to start engaging the several interested groups. > > /be _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
