On Jun 26, 2011, at 10:54 AM, Axel Rauschmayer wrote: > This would only work inside an object literal
or in a method in a class. > (similar to |super|, where you need to know about |here|, the owning object). > Additionally, Allen’s Object.defineMethod already has a parameter with the > method name, so it would work there, too. Allowing 'super' in any function, requiring Object.defineMethod to be used with an object and a name for that function to be callable and survive its first super reference, is plausible and as you note, there's a name to burn into the function if necessary. But I still wonder if we wouldn't be better off restricting where super can occur. I can't prove it, but we are following in the universal-'this' footsteps (but with static or else Object.defineMethod binding). That sounds a warning bell in my head. /be _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
