On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Brendan Eich <bren...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> On Jul 8, 2011, at 7:43 AM, Juan Ignacio Dopazo wrote: > > My first thought was: why not just statically replace this.x, with private > x, with this[xPrivateName] and forget about accessing private properties > of other objects? That would still leave the problem of closures inside > methods, though... > > > If xPrivateName is a private name object, then there's no reason to "forget > about accessing private properties of other objects". Both > this[xPrivateName] and other[xPrivateName] work as you would expect. > > /be > You are very much right. What are the open issues with privates in classes then? Juan
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
