Le 15/07/2011 00:16, Brendan Eich a écrit : > On Jul 14, 2011, at 3:00 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote: > >>> Host objects are part of the platform. A platform provider is free >>> to violate any part of the spec they like, and there's nothing we >>> can do about it other than to add tests to std test suites to make >>> the violations obvious to the community. >> >> We could provide a defined interface mechanism that validates >> constraints or limits behavior in a way that guarantees the desired >> invariants. That's what Proxies appear to be trying to do, why not do >> it for host objects. If you can depend upon host objects actually >> supporting your invariants why does not matter whether or not Proxy >> objects also do so. > > For the record, Mozilla wants its "host objects" to be only as > powerful as Proxies. Current web compatibility constraints don't allow > this but we want to evolve the standards, de facto (over time) and de > jure, toward that goal. Do you have examples?
> Some Proxy extensions may be needed, too, so it's not all up to web > compatibility to take the hit. Do you have such Proxy extensions in mind already? Cheers, David
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
