On Jul 19, 2011, at 11:07 AM, Bob Nystrom wrote: > // "new" lets you declare members on new instances. these would presumably be
> // invoked on the new object before the constructor body is run. > new: > numAttacks = 0; > // declaring an instance property here mainly so you can document it. could > be > // useful later for guards or other annotations. > name; The plain name; also looks like a useless expression-statement. Beyond this, I'm concerned that per-instance properties need initializers that use constructor parameters. So they ought to be initialized in the constructor. Whether they can be declared outside the constructor is a separate issue. Perhaps if they have constant or constructor-invariant initializers, they can be initialized where declared too. But declarations should look different from expressions. The alternative we keep returning to is the property assignment sub-grammar of object literals, which would want new: numAttacks: 0; with a semicolon not a comma. Anyway, this is a detail, and we could even defer it and still have a better class proposal using your C++-inspired label idea. I'm quite taken with that! /be
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss