On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Kyle Simpson <get...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Of course, if the WeakMap really was both weak-key and weak-value, then I'd > absolutely expect the name to be WeakMap (I think "weak" in this case is a > useful and non-trivial part of the behavior). So my complaint is not "Weak", > but that "Weak" implies something more comprehensive than is actually the > case. It over-promises and under-delivers, so to speak. > Ok, how about WeakishMap? You would find it where you expected to look, and the name would make you read the docs to see how it is different. Mostly joking... mostly. -- John A. Tamplin Software Engineer (GWT), Google
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
