I'd recommend sticking sticking with "ES.next" as much as possible. Everything is still subject to change and there remains a lot of opportunity for creating confusion by talking about what is "in" ES6.
Allen On Sep 19, 2011, at 12:54 PM, Rick Waldron wrote: > It appears that ES6 is ok: http://www.slideshare.net/BrendanEich/capitol-js > > > Rick > > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Axel Rauschmayer <a...@rauschma.de> wrote: > Or is ECMAScript.next still the better term? > > -- > Dr. Axel Rauschmayer > > a...@rauschma.de > twitter.com/rauschma > > home: rauschma.de > blog: 2ality.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
