On Oct 1, 2011, at 1:57 AM, Waldemar Horwat wrote: > On 09/30/2011 04:37 PM, Brendan Eich wrote: >> since we haven't come up with a way to do 2 and 5 that works, > > That's what makes this into a dead end. Worse, by claiming the class syntax > you'd be precluding finding a different way that works in the future.
That does not follow. Item 2 is guaranteed shape, item 5 is const instance variable. We can add these later, restricting the syntax for now to exclude anything like 'const' instance variable declarations. This does not preclude adding such extensions later. /be _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
