Correct. My bad. -- Dr. Axel Rauschmayer rauschma.de [Sent from a mobile device, please forgive brevity and typos]
On Oct 28, 2011, at 8:02, Allen Wirfs-Brock <al...@wirfs-brock.com> wrote: > > On Oct 27, 2011, at 3:08 AM, Axel Rauschmayer wrote: > >> +1. Where the spec is already almost pseudo-code, its readability would >> improve if it was, in fact, pseudo-code. > > I don't understand? The current spec. is pseudo-code, not almost pseudo code > (however, there are some sections that are not fully expressed using > pseudo-code but instead depend upon English prose). It sounds like by "in > fact, pseudo-code" you mean a semantically complete fully specified > executable language. That doesn't sound like "pseudo code" to me, it sounds > like "code". See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudocode > > > Allen
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
