> super Foo.bar(x) should desugar to Foo.prototype.bar.call(this, x)
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:object_initialiser_super
What is that you don’t like about Allen’s proposal? You are still hard-coding
the name of the super-constructor (which is what `super` nicely avoids).
> If people make constructors of the type that are designed to be called
> with new then it works for constructors too.
>
> // Works with super, used with var foo = new Foo.prototype.constructor()
> constructor: function() {
> this.x = 0;
> this.y = 0;
> }
>
> // Doesn't work with super, used with var foo = Foo.prototype.constructor()
> constructor: function() {
> return {x: 0, y: 0}
> }
>
> // Also doesn't work with super
> constructor: function() {
> var self = factory();
> self.x = 0;
> self.y = 0;
> return self;
> }
I don’t understand. Are you really pointing out something that will cause
difficulty with your proposal or a general problem?
--
Dr. Axel Rauschmayer
a...@rauschma.de
home: rauschma.de
twitter: twitter.com/rauschma
blog: 2ality.com
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
