> > Current proposal would turn a configurable non-writable property into a >> writable property which is not a silent error, but rather a big mistake. >> > > If that is the case then I agree that would be bad. Whether we want to > throw an error or silently do a no-op is another discussion. > > Given that it would throw if any of the 3 (or n) properties your trying to > extend fails it would make more sense to have a silent no-op as a default. > This way the other property extensions succeed. >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
