On Jan 16, 2012, at 1:02 PM, Axel Rauschmayer <a...@rauschma.de> 
> 
> From where I’m standing, AMD is already a standard in browser space.

By definition, AMD not a "standard" in the browser space. I challenge anyone to 
cite more then 5 high traffic sites that actually use AMD. Don't get me wrong, 
I'm not opposed to AMD, I just don't think it's sparse adoption is grounds to 
call it a "standard".

> The only negative reaction I have seen is by Node.js developers – their 
> reasons make sense from a server-centric viewpoint, but (IMHO) less if you 
> are considering the bigger picture of using the same language for client and 
> server. AMD’s greatest advantage is that its core is very simple and that it 
> lends itself to asynchronous loading (which is a must for browsers).
> 
> 
> +1
> 
> -- 
> Dr. Axel Rauschmayer
> a...@rauschma.de
> 
> home: rauschma.de
> twitter: twitter.com/rauschma
> blog: 2ality.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss@mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to