On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Wes Garland <w...@page.ca> wrote: > On 17 January 2012 13:05, Russell Leggett <russell.legg...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> After all, e4x is just an extension to JS, it should be possible to add >> the data types natively and then make any e4x code work as syntactic sugar, >> which you can desugar yourself. >> > > I don't really know the details, but that is definitely not true. Ask Jeff > Walden from Mozilla for details, if you can convince him to discuss the > topic. :) >
Ah, that's too bad. I'll admit I hadn't looked at it quite in depth enough to say for sure, but it seemed fine from my limited knowledge. I guess not. > > This may be true for "something approaching E4X", and might be a great way > to approach the community's needs. An XML library and a pre-processor. > > Wes > > -- > Wesley W. Garland > Director, Product Development > PageMail, Inc. > +1 613 542 2787 x 102 >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
