Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
water under the bridge...
Sure, but it matters for distinguishing my "inconsistent" advocacy of removing the hated initialiser, vs. keeping destructuring in for-in LHS.
Really, I'm ok with not supporting destructuring for-in LHS. That will require more spec work, but so does killing the initialiser for let and const as you noted. So, are we agreed? No initialiser, no for-in destructuring (with or without a declaring keyword)?
/be _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
