David Herman wrote:
As I've said before, this uses "from" inconsistently -- it muddles the difference between binding a name to an external module (module x from "foo.js") and binding a name to a specific export of an external module (import x from "foo.js").
Another point of view: "from" says go get it if you don't have it. "module" says the module body is what you get. "import" says bind exports from the designated module in the current block scope.
In this light "from" can't be read by itself, you have to look for the leading "module" or "import". But maybe that's better than using something static or passive such as "at" instead?
/be _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
