On 12 April 2012 16:27, Peter van der Zee <e...@qfox.nl> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Andreas Rossberg <rossb...@google.com> wrote: >>> Haha nice try even with unicode escapes it still refers to "true" the >>> boolean not the function. >> >> That's another FF deviation from the standard, though. > > Identifiers with unicode escapes have the meaning of their canonical > value. So wouldn't that (tru\u0065 referring to the bool) be valid and > according to the spec?
Yes, but keywords (and other verbatim tokens, like 'true') are recognized _before_ canonicalization. At least that is the intention of the spec, Waldemar told me. (I filed https://bugs.ecmascript.org/show_bug.cgi?id=277 a few weeks ago as a request for making the wording clearer.) /Andreas _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
