On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Domenic Denicola <dome...@domenicdenicola.com> wrote: > * Traceur seems to be coming along nicely, but its alignment with the spec > leaves a lot to be desired. Destructuring just got fixed a few days ago, and > they have a class syntax you have to avoid to write ES6-as-it-is--compatible > code. They have features like private names that are not (really) in the spec > yet, using speculative syntax (`new Name` was never harmonized, was it?). > Monocle-mustache is in, somehow. Etc. It's ES6-like, but doesn't reflect > TC39's actual progress, instead reflecting the Traceur team's interpretation > of where TC39 might eventually, hopefully, end up. Subsetting might be a > solution, assuming the semantics of the subsetted features are aligned with > the spec, but determining that would require further investigation.
Each feature in Traceur is individually controlled by options, so you can use your own judgement and turn off any feature you don't believe will make it in to ES-6. Traceur is open source and your contributions would be welcomed. It's pretty easy to work with. jjb _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
