On May 29, 2012, at 9:00 PM, Russell Leggett wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:52 PM, John Tamplin <j...@google.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Yehuda Katz <wyc...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm not sure if this makes sense, but something about breaking `call` and > `apply` doesn't sit right with me. > > Why should an arrow function be treated any differently than an explicitly > bound function (ie, via bind)? > > Hah, you beat me too it, I was typing in almost the exact same thing. And not > just bind, either - even the kind of workarounds people would use before bind > like 'var self = this' sorts of things. If someone writes code using the > arrow, what they want is to use the lexically scoped this - they want to use > 'this' just like any other reference captured by the closure.
+1 Dave
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
