On 31 May 2012 11:30, François REMY <[email protected]> wrote:

>  o.{
>>    a.b = 6;
>>    c.f();
>>    a.b = a.c; // !!
>> };
>>
>
> This is indeed an issue that could be solved using
>
>   o.{
>       .a.b = 6;
>       .c.f();
>       .a.b = .a.c;
>   }


Exactly my thought, and as it happens I was just writing it up: See my
"'with' revisited and related to object extension literals".

-- T.J.
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to