On Mar 23, 2012, at 8:16 AM, Steven Levithan wrote: > Although this is only a minor convenience since you can do something like > text.replace(/[-[\]{}()*+?.,\\^$|]/g, "\\$&"), the list of special characters > is subject to change.
That sounds like another good argument for standardizing. The only challenge I see is how to fudge the spec enough to mandate that any extended, non-standard operators that the engine provides should also be escaped. Dave _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss