Erik Arvidsson wrote:
At the face to face meeting we agreed that if no constructor is present in a class a default one is provided as if the following constructor was present.class C extends null { constructor(...args) { super(...args) } } What should this do when C extends null? If this was manually added I would prefer that this would be a runtime error.
Agreed. Allen probably has a thought. I think we just did not discuss this case, or overlooked it.
Should we special case this and use an empty constructor if the super class is null?
+1. /be _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
