On 26 September 2012 15:02, Brendan Eich <[email protected]> wrote: > Let's agree that AssignmentExpression is ok (required for the left-most > comprehension expression). The main nannying objection was to trying to ban > = at top level of if and for heads. > > If we can settle on this, I'm ok with it given the custom grammar already > required for if and for in comprehensions. It's not like anyone will truly > want / need to write comma expressions in heads, as I said yesterday!
Sounds good to me. > Separate question to you: (for|let|if)+ is what Jason championed, are you on > board? Right, I see no reason to artificially restrict the syntax to specific cases, especially given that it wouldn't make the expansion any simpler. So I also favour (for|if)+ or (for|let|if)+ (having let makes sense, although it probably isn't super important). /Andreas _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
