Ah, thanks. I've got it :) On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 4:36 AM, Rick Waldron <waldron.r...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Yusuke Suzuki <utatane....@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> In rev10 draft, TypeArray is described. >> But why TypeArray instead of TypedArray? In WebGL's spec( >> http://www.khronos.org/registry/typedarray/specs/latest/ ), TypedArray >> is used, so I think using TypedArray name is better. >> > > Looks like a typo... I went ahead and filed a bug > > https://bugs.ecmascript.org/show_bug.cgi?id=673 > > >> TypeArray name makes me think array of types, such as [String, Array, >> Object, Function]. >> > > Ha, I was thinking the same thing :) > > >> >> Regards, >> Yusuke Suzuki >> >> _______________________________________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> es-discuss@mozilla.org >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >> >> >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
