On Friday, October 12, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Kevin Smith wrote:

>  
> > This looks like the sort of thing that will get labeled "uselessly 
> > unreliable", then again I was in favor of making length equal the number of 
> > formal parameters—rest included.  
>  
> Right - the simpler the rule, the better for this kind of thing.  I wouldn't 
> include rest, though, because it's "cardinality" is really infinity, and 
> therefore not particularly useful in this context.
+1  

Sorry, should've clarified: that was my initial inclination, some time ago. Yes 
I agree with "everything but the rest".

Rick
>  
> But the simplest rule would require a change to the reported length of some 
> built-ins, as Allen has said.  Tradeoffs...
>  
> Kevin  

_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to