On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Andrea Giammarchi < andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I never said they made a decision without valid considerations, I am > saying I haven't seen any informal survey **here**, the place where > theoretically we discuss ECMAScript and its present and future. I've already explained why that is: there is a general aversion to "design by survey". I only used the information in the survey to help _me_ decide if it was even worth using committee time to discuss. > > I want believe it makes sense to keep discussing here, as it has always > been, and I don't want to be informed after about decisions made somewhere > else ... even if ultra valid, a quick note/survey here cannot hurt but > inform subscribers, I hope you agree. > Sure, I mistakenly assumed that this had been cc'ed to es-discuss http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-script-coord/2012OctDec/0164.html ...and never bothered to double check. Rick
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
