On 27 December 2012 23:38, Andreas Rossberg <rossb...@google.com> wrote:
> I don't feel qualified to talk for Scheme, but all Ocaml I've ever
> seen (SML uses more verbose 'let' syntax anyway) formatted the above as
>
> let sq = x * x in
>> print ("sq: " ^ toString sq ^ "\n");
>>
>> let y = sq / 2 in
>> print ("y: " ^ toString y ^ "\n")
>
>
> Similarly, in Haskell you would write
>
> do
>
> let sq = x * x
>> putStr ("sq: " ++ show sq ++ "\n")
>>
>> let y = sq / 2
>> putStr ("y: " ++ show y ++ "\n")
>
>
Don't know where the empty lines in the middle of both examples are coming
from, weird Gmail quote-editing glitch that didn't show up in the edit box.
Assume them absent. :)
/Andreas
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
