> However, I agree that the destructuring syntax for module imports may not
> be the clearest choice in terms of raising the right expectations. (As we
> have discovered already, it has other issues, namely people confusing the
> direction of renaming.) Maybe it is a bit too clever, and considering
> alternatives a worthwhile idea.
>
There's this:
import x as y, a as b from "url";
But I find that much less readable than:
import { x: y, a: b } from "url";
Destructuring syntax is what it is. Developers just need to start reading
it the right way.
{ Kevin }
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
