> I raised this problem-case, so I want to point out that we could take
> other courses:
>
> * Reckon that labels are rare and this won't bite, so let it stand, just as
>
> a = b
> (c)
>
> is a hazard today -- and one that bites much more.
>
> * Don't allow suffix-? to be followed by a newline.
Leaving aside ASI for a moment, there are other issues:
let v = obj?+(0+1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+...+n):null;
We don't know whether this is a conditional expression or not until we get
to the ":" an arbitrary distance away from the "?". We might be able to
use another cover grammar approach here, but is it worth it?
>
> You must have meant (2).
>
Yep!
>
> Apart from deviating from the cowpath (CoffeeScript), prefix-? is
> equivalent to suffix-? as I argued in reply to Herby. We'd want to support
>
> let ?{p: v} = o;
> let v = ?o.p;
>
> to handle the case of undefined or null 'o', of course, in which case v
> would be initialized to undefined.
>
Would we? This is something a little different than "irrefutable property
get". Thinking...
{ Kevin }
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
