> > > Also, I don’t see why constructors need to use the “private.x” syntax > whereas other methods get to use the free variable? >
They wouldn't. I was just trying to show the different ways to do the same thing. > **** > > ** ** > > With these in mind I give the following fork: > https://gist.github.com/4562796 > Cool variation! We still might want to use @ for (unique) symbols though... (?) Also, "private" makes it clear we are dealing with a separate (although intimately related) object. { Kevin }
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
