Le 21/01/2013 19:20, Andreas Rossberg a écrit :
On 21 Jan 2013 17:33, "Tom Van Cutsem" <tomvc...@gmail.com
<mailto:tomvc...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> So let's revisit the assumption: if a membrane does intercept and
wrap symbols, then two previously isolated pieces of code can never
come to share the same private symbol.
I'm not sure I understand what "wrapping a symbol" would actually
mean. Are you implying that proxies that target a symbol should
actually be usable _as_ a symbol?
Maybe that's what Tom meant, but in the case he described, creating a
corresponding new private symbol would work just fine without having to
create a proxy around a private symbol.
David
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
