On Feb 12, 2013, at 8:51 AM, Domenic Denicola wrote: > Oooh, static getters and setters, nice.
Of course, they aren't actually static in any real sense. That's just the keyword. They are just regularly dynamic properties of the class (ie constructor) object. Allen > > Glad to see the max-min idea seems to be working out well :). Little > incremental improvements like this seem natural and a joy to use. Awesome to > see them in Traceur so quickly too! > ________________________________________ > From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on > behalf of Erik Arvidsson [[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 10:49 > To: Kevin Smith > Cc: es-discuss > Subject: Re: Class Method Syntax > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote: >> First, thanks for creating a proposal for this. A couple of questions: >> >> 1) Is class method syntax slated for ES6? > > Yes. > >> 2) I assume that we'd parse "static" the same way we parse "get" and "set", >> e.g. this is possible: >> >> class C { >> static() {} // Method "static" on C instance >> static static() {} // Method "static" on C >> } > > Yes. > > https://code.google.com/p/traceur-compiler/source/browse/test/feature/Classes/Static.js#23 > > -- > erik > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
