Tom Schuster wrote:
I like to disagree. I was quite familiar with the ES spec about a year ago and this still confused me. Only because this is pre-existing doesn't make the language very clear.
I agree it's a bit awkward learning to read every Clause 15 method spec in terms of the Clause 15 intro's subtle language about missing arguments. Kind of a pain, really. But in the interest of a minimal spec, to avoid redundancy that can then mutate and diverge, making spec bugs, we generally try to hoist such common "code", if you will.
Do you think a specific change should be made for Object.is, or for all method specs in 15?
/be _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
