On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Brendan Eich <bren...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> Your writing is unclear and overlong, and full of unjustified airs of > grievance -- please work on it. I'll do more than that, I publicly and officially apologies for my writing plus I will step back from this ML for an undefined amount of time so you can all keep doing your best to make JavaScript awesome without me bothering at all. Just please, don't forget that not everyone needs to interpretate ES runtime if not online IDEs or some other use case, as SES is ... but those are use cases indeed and those are not the Web and should not affect the future of a programming language that happily runs already on the server too and would like to be **as unsafe as possible when needed** (runtime optimized pre-compiled Function(string) is only a case, fn.caller could be another, etc) but **also a better language when it is possible** (i.e. Object.setPrototypeOf() deprecating the __proto__ magic) Last, but not least, all I've always tried to do in this ML since ever is exactly the same you all do every day: make the Web awesome, caring for all possible real use-cases I've experienced in my 12+ hands on client/server/db web development experience and all of them with JS on the front or the back end. Well, it is quite clear to me that here, in this ML, I've failed. Best Regards
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
