But as I wrote privately, I don't think we can firehose all the new APIs through public-script-coord and get good API review results. We could go API by API in a more focused forum or meeting-like setting, with public-script-coord hosting the notices for upcoming reviews, progress updates, and review conclusions. Thoughts?

In principle, github would offer the means for review input from
the public (those who are meant to be using those APIs later on).

It might be too firehosey (everybody on the web submitting tiny
yet mutually exclusive suggestions), but perhaps a protocol of
"serious reviews only, quality before quantity, please" could be established? Or a filter by proven-to-be-useful contributions?

Claus

PS. I would permit public-script-coord to archive my messages,
   but I refuse to support an archive that doesn't even try to
   obfuscate email addresses. Hence they won't appear there:-(

_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to