Yes, you do. On Apr 26, 2013 2:54 PM, "Kevin Smith" <zenpars...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What exactly is the controversy here? > > I think we all agree with the semantics of "then" as specified in > Promises/A+. (If not, then we have a really big problem!) > > If so, then the only real controversy is whether or not the API allows one > to create a promise whose eventual value is itself a promise. Q does not: > it provides only "resolve" and "reject". DOM Futures do by way of > "Future.accept". As far as I know, there's nothing about Q's > implementation that would make such a function impossible, it just does not > provide one. > > Do I have that right so far? > > { Kevin } > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss